BibleMarriages
Polygyny

HonestYouthPastor – Polygamy Response Part 1

Video1:18:41

Part 1 of a Berean response to HonestYouthPastor’s case against biblical polygyny: testing his 1 Timothy 4 “doctrine of demons” claim, the Rachel and Leah “dysfunction” charge, his 2 Samuel 12 “property transfer” reading, and Matthew 19’s one flesh.

HonestYouthPastor released a two-hour rebuttal to Rich Tidwell after the Protestia story about a pastor taking a second wife. This is Part 1 of a point-by-point answer that sets aside the poisoning-the-well framing and tests each claim against Scripture. The thesis is simple: absent a command limiting a man to one marriage, plural marriage is not a separate construct needing defense — it is simply marriage, and where there is no law there is no transgression.

The argument answered

  • The “doctrine of demons” move: HYP grants 1 Timothy 4 condemns those who forbid marriage and food, then we ask whether forbidding a man a second wife is itself a forbidding of marriage worth examining.
  • The three-marriages comparison: lumping polygyny with celibate priests and interracial marriage is guilt-by-association — agree with two, smuggle in the third as equal.
  • Ruth 4:11 and Rachel and Leah: their names are invoked as a blessing on Ruth and Boaz, and Scripture says the two women “built up the house of Israel” — hardly an abomination held up in a wedding blessing.
  • The “dysfunctional household” charge: reading Genesis 29–30 in isolation to condemn plural marriage is eisegesis; by that logic Cain murdering Abel argues against having children. Sin causes the strife, not the structure.
  • The adultery definition: HYP concedes adultery is taking a woman already married or betrothed — which is exactly why Bathsheba was sin but Abigail and Ahinoam were not, and why no patriarch ever repented of a second wife.
  • The 2 Samuel 12 “property transfer”: God says He gave David his master’s wives and would have given more; the plain reading blesses the wives David had and condemns only the taking of Uriah’s one wife.
  • Matthew 19 “one flesh” and the “mias” / one-wife setup: the part closes as HYP tries to fuse Genesis 2:24 with the 1 Timothy 3 elder qualification to force “first wife.”

Scriptures examined

  • 1 Timothy 4:1–6 — deceitful spirits, doctrines of demons, forbidding marriage and foods
  • Ruth 4:11 — Rachel and Leah “built up the house of Israel”
  • Genesis 29–30 — Leah, Rachel, and the building of Jacob’s house
  • Genesis 4 — Cain and Abel (the “dysfunction” counterpoint)
  • 2 Samuel 12:7–9 — Nathan’s rebuke, “I gave you your master’s wives”
  • Leviticus 20:10; Deuteronomy 4:2; 12:32; 13 — the definition of adultery and the prohibition on adding to the law
  • Matthew 19:3–12 — divorce, “one flesh,” and the eunuch saying
  • Genesis 2:24; 1 Timothy 3:2 — “one flesh” and “husband of one wife”

Why it matters

If the church has forbidden a kind of marriage God never forbade, that is no small error. This is Part 1 of a two-part response; continue with Part 2, which takes up 1 Corinthians 7, the eunuch calling, and Isaiah 4:1.

Newsletter

New teachings in your inbox.

Freely received, freely given — support the work →

More from the well
Article
Article6 min read

Jesus said that even looking at a woman with lust is adultery

As with everything, context matters. What is the context of this passage? Let's back up one verse to find out, the majority of people who use this verse as a monogamy-only proof text fail to include the verse prior to it which sets the context.

Video3:21:08

Pastor Rich Tidwell – What Scripture Actually Says

After Pastor Rich Tidwell publicly took a second wife and broke the internet, four men test the monogamy-only doctrine against Scripture and ask where the ban on biblical polygyny actually came from.