BibleMarriages
Polygyny

Part 2 - Responding to @ReformationRedPill "Does Scripture TRULY forbid polygamy"

Video55:30

Does “husband of one wife” forbid polygamy? Part 2 answers the invented “sub-creational sin” category, the 1 Timothy 3:2 elder argument, Calvin and Chrysostom, and shows from Abimelech in Genesis 20 that adultery is taking another man’s wife — not taking a wife.

The heart of Reformation Red Pill’s case is 1 Timothy 3:2 — “the husband of one wife” — read as Paul outlawing plural marriage for every man, not just elders. This part answers that the verse names a positive qualification (be married, be faithful), never says only one, and that calling polygyny sin requires a law no one can produce. Sin is the transgression of God’s law; an appeal to Calvin, Chrysostom, or a new “sub-creational” category is not a command.

This is Part 2 of a 3-part response — start with Part 1 and finish with Part 3.

The argument answered

  • The “sub-creational sin” category invented from the Westminster Catechism’s “want of conformity” — a man-made label used to call sin what God’s law never forbids.
  • The claim that divorce is itself a sin God merely “regulated,” answered by God describing Himself as a husband of two wives who issues a writ of divorce to Israel.
  • 1 Timothy 3:2: the Greek heis means one, first, or some — “husband of one wife” no more caps a man at one wife than “one car” caps him at one car; read as only-one, it would disqualify God, Jacob, David, and Solomon from eldership.
  • The appeal to Calvin and Chrysostom: respected men importing a Greco-Roman bias, calling polygyny a “stain” and “corruption” without ever citing the law it transgresses.
  • The negative-inference fallacy and the consistency trap: if “husband of one wife” binds all men, then zero wives is also disqualifying — celibacy condemned — and serial divorce-and-remarry would somehow qualify.
  • The Levitical high priest (a virgin bride only) shows particular office-rules don’t become universal sins — marrying a widow isn’t sin just because a high priest couldn’t.
  • Abimelech in Genesis 20: already a polygamist, he takes Sarah “in the integrity of his heart,” and God calls him righteous — the only problem was that she was married, proving adultery is taking another man’s wife.

Scriptures examined

  • 1 Timothy 3:2 — overseer, “husband of one wife”
  • Exodus 21:10 — a second wife’s food, clothing, and conjugal rights protected
  • Jeremiah 3:8 — God divorces faithless Israel; God as husband of two
  • Ruth 4:11 — Rachel and Leah built the house of Israel
  • 2 Chronicles 24:1–3 — Joash did right in the Lord’s sight; Jehoiada gave him two wives
  • Leviticus 20:10 — the death penalty for a woman with two men (the actual law on adultery)
  • Genesis 20 — Abimelech, Sarah, and “the integrity of your heart”

Why it matters

If a sin must transgress a law, then the burden is to name the command — chapter, verse, and penalty — that forbids a man a second wife. Where there is no law, there is no transgression.

Newsletter

New teachings in your inbox.

Freely received, freely given — support the work →

More from the well
Article
Article6 min read

Jesus said that even looking at a woman with lust is adultery

As with everything, context matters. What is the context of this passage? Let's back up one verse to find out, the majority of people who use this verse as a monogamy-only proof text fail to include the verse prior to it which sets the context.

Video1:18:41

HonestYouthPastor – Polygamy Response Part 1

Part 1 of a Berean response to HonestYouthPastor’s case against biblical polygyny: testing his 1 Timothy 4 “doctrine of demons” claim, the Rachel and Leah “dysfunction” charge, his 2 Samuel 12 “property transfer” reading, and Matthew 19’s one flesh.

Video3:21:08

Pastor Rich Tidwell – What Scripture Actually Says

After Pastor Rich Tidwell publicly took a second wife and broke the internet, four men test the monogamy-only doctrine against Scripture and ask where the ban on biblical polygyny actually came from.